WebFeb 15, 2015 · We are aware of the recent Tirkey v Chandok Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment and are considering its implications for discrimination law. The judgment opens the possibility of a legal remedy for claims of caste-associated discrimination under existing legislation, in the ethnic origins element of Section 9 of the Equality Act 2010. WebAli v. Office of National Statistics [2005] IRLR 201; Chandok v. Tirkey [2015] IRLR 195; Abercrombie & Others v. EJA Rangemaster Ltd [2013] IRLR 953 that the claimant was seeking to introduce a new claim of unfair dismissal which 15 constituted a “substantial alteration. In other words, it was submitted that the
The Equality Act 2010 - researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk
WebJan 31, 2024 · Get free access to the complete judgment in Ms C Israel v Capita Customer Management Ltd and Department for Work and Pensions (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) on CaseMine. WebChandok v Tirkey (UKEAT/0190/14/KN), CIP Properties (AIPT) Ltd v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd [2015] EWHC 1345, Reuters Limited v Cole (UKEAT/0258/17/BA), Rose and Ors v Creativity etc Limited [2024] EWHC 1043 (and Quah Su Ling v Goldman Sachs International [2015] EWHC 759 (Comm) and Nesbit Law Group LLP v Acasta European … braham brewery
Capturing Caste in Law: Caste Discrimination and the Equality Act …
WebFeb 21, 2014 · Ms Tirkey was employed by Mr and Mrs Chandok as a domestic servant originally in India and then in the UK. Ms Tirkey is of the Adivasi caste, known as a “servant caste” and usually likened to ... Web6. Lord Justice Langstaff in Chandok v Tirkey [2015] IRLR 195 set out; “The claim, as set out in the ET1, is not something just to set the ball rolling, as an initial document necessary to comply with time limits but which is otherwise free to be augmented by whatever the parties choose to add or subtract merely upon their say so. hacker toeic listening